Long-term outcomes and durability of balloon-expandable TAVI in small and large annuli.
Masanori Yamamoto, Hirofumi Hioki, Ai Kagase, Hiroshi Tsunamoto, Takahiro Tokuda, Atsuhi Sugiura, Tetsuro Shimura, Azusa Murata, Ryo Yamaguchi, Shinichi Shirai, Kenichi Ishizu, Yohei Ohno, Fumiaki Yashima, Toru Naganuma, Yusuke Watanabe
Abstract
Open AccessBACKGROUND: Evidence regarding the long-term outcomes and durability of balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (BE-THVs) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is still scarce. AIMS: This study evaluates these outcomes and further examines their association with the annular size in patients. METHODS: A total of 2,699 patients who had undergone TAVI with a BE-THV at least 5 years prior to our study were analysed. A small aortic annulus (SAA) was defined as an area ≤430 mm2; any larger annuli were labelled large aortic annuli (LAA). The primary endpoints were the incidence of all-cause mortality and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) between the SAA and LAA groups. As a subanalysis, the primary endpoints were examined in relation to postprocedural mean pressure gradient (mPG) ≥20 mmHg, severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM), and sex differences, comparing SAA and LAA each time. RESULTS: Overall, 66.4% (n=1,793) of patients were categorised into the SAA group. At 7 years after TAVI, the cumulative all-cause mortality showed differences between the SAA and LAA groups (55.2% vs 58.6%), while BVF assessed by Gray's test was similar between the groups (3.3% vs 2.7%). The Cox multivariable analysis revealed no association between SAA and worse prognosis (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 0.85-1.36; p=0.56). There were no significant differences in mortality or BVF regarding an mPG ≥20 mmHg, severe PPM, or sex between the SAA and LAA groups (allp>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Annular size differences were not found to influence long-term outcomes or valve durability following TAVI with a BE-THV, suggesting that other factors warrant further investigation.