A Systematic Review of Government-Led Free Caesarean Section Policies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries from 2009 to 2025.

Background: Caesarean section (CS) is a critical intervention, yet stark inequities in access persist across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Over the last decade, governments have introduced policies to eliminate or subsidize user fees; however, the collective impact of these initiatives on utilization, equity, and financial protection has not been fully synthesized. Methods: We conducted a systematic review in line with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Dimensions, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, and government portals for studies published between 1 January 2009 and 30 May 2025. Eligible studies evaluated government-initiated financing reforms, including full user-fee exemptions, partial subsidies, vouchers, insurance schemes, and provider-payment restructuring. Two reviewers independently applied the PICOS criteria, extracted data using a 15-item template, and assessed the study quality. Given heterogeneity, results were synthesized narratively. Results: Thirty-seven studies from 28 LMICs were included. Most (70%) evaluated fee exemptions. Mixed-methods and cross-sectional designs predominated, while only six studies employed interrupted time series designs. Twenty-two evaluations (59%) reported increased CS uptake, ranging from a 1.4-fold rise in Senegal to a threefold increase in Kano State, Nigeria. Similar surges were also observed in non-African contexts such as Iran and Georgia, where reforms included incentives for vaginal delivery or punitive tariffs to curb overuse. Fourteen of 26 fee-exemption studies documented pro-rich or pro-urban drift, while catastrophic expenditure persisted for 12-43% of households, despite the implementation of "free" policies. Median out-of-pocket costs ranged from USD 14 in Burkina Faso to nearly USD 300 in Dakar's slums. Only one study linked reforms to a reduction in neonatal mortality (a 30% decrease in Mali/Benin), while none demonstrated an impact on maternal mortality. Qualitative evidence highlighted hidden costs, delayed reimbursements, and weak accountability. At the same time, China and Bangladesh demonstrated how demographic reforms or voucher schemes could inadvertently lead to CS overuse or expose gaps in service readiness. Conclusions: Government-led financing reforms consistently increased CS volumes but fell short of ensuring equity, financial protection, or sustained quality. Effective initiatives combined fee removal with investments in surgical capacity, timely reimbursement, and transparent accountability. Future CS policies must integrate real-time monitoring of equity and quality and adopt robust quasi-experimental designs to enable mid-course correction.