Assessment of Antibiotic Resistance and Microbial Contamination in Commercial Veterinary Probiotic Products.
Shuo Guan, Chunguang Wang, Zongshu Zhang, Mengfan Wang, Xinghua Zhao, Tie Zhang
Abstract
Open AccessProbiotics are widely used as feed additives in livestock production, yet the overall safety of commercially available veterinary probiotics remains insufficiently assessed. In this study, 33 probiotic products marketed in Northern China were systematically evaluated with respect to strain composition, label accuracy, antimicrobial resistance, and the diversity of resistance genes. A total of 32 Bacillus spp. were isolated, many of which showed resistance to multiple antibiotics. Labeling inaccuracies were prevalent: none of the products specified strain names and numbers, 33% (11/33) failed to report viable bacterial counts, 9% (3/33) lacked their claimed key ingredients, and 21% (7/33) contained isolated strains that did not match the label. High-throughput quantitative PCR (HT-qPCR) analysis further revealed that all 27 tested products harbored abundant antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), with 241 ARGs and seven mobile genetic elements (MGEs) detected. The ARGs were primarily associated with tetracycline, aminoglycosides, β-lactams, and macrolide-lincosamide-streptomycin B (MLSB) antibiotics, and co-occurrence analysis showed a strong positive correlation between ARG and MGE abundance, with Clostridium and Enterococcus identified as potential hosts. These findings underscore significant quality and safety deficiencies in veterinary probiotics and highlight potential risks to animal, human, and environmental health, emphasizing the relevance of a One Health perspective in probiotic evaluation and regulation.