Lived Experiences of Men Working in Both White-Collar and Blue-Collar Jobs: A Systematic Literature Review.

The objective of this systematic review was to identify, appraise, and meta-synthesize qualitative evidence regarding the experiences and perceptions of men in both white-collar and blue-collar jobs. The systematic review of qualitative studies searches was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, EBSCohost, ProQuest, CINAHL, and PsycINFO of articles published between 2005 and 2025 to ensure information is current and relevant to modern practices and to analyze trends and the evolution of a research field over a significant period of 20 years. In total, 2,074 articles were identified, and after screening using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 12 studies were included in the review. The search strategy included a combination of Smart Texting searching of the three main concepts being examined in this review (experience/perception, pressure at work, and coping strategies). Study quality was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool. Qualitative data were analyzed using a meta-ethnographic approach, comprising reciprocal syntheses of participants' experiences in both white-collar and blue-collar jobs. A lines-of-argument synthesis is presented that identified the key elements of the experiences, perceptions, work environments, and coping strategies of men in white-collar and blue-collar jobs. This systematic review used meta-ethnographic approach to synthesize qualitative evidence regarding the experiences and perceptions of men in both white-collar and blue-collar jobs. The lack of trust together with hegemonic masculinity made it difficult for men to timely communicate and seek help for any prevailing problems. The societal concept that categorizes men as strong gender has not been helpful to the physical, mental, and psychological wellbeing of men.