Implementation Challenges of a Multi-Center Financial Navigation Intervention: A Qualitative Analysis of Operational Process Data.
Austin R Waters, Michelle L Manning, Camille R Murray, Bridgette Thom, Kevin Pignone, Arrianna Marie Planey, Mindy Gellin, Neda Padilla, Sarah A Birken, Donald L Rosenstein, Stephanie B Wheeler
Abstract
Open AccessIntroductionThe Lessening the Impact of Financial Toxicity (LIFT) intervention-a financial navigation intervention-demonstrated preliminary effectiveness. Scaling LIFT to an eight-site single-arm trial, however, posed implementation challenges that were not present in the single-site pilot study. Here, we analyze factors influencing LIFT implementation.MethodsWe used a deductive-inductive hybrid qualitative approach to analyze transcribed meeting recordings from 55 technical assistance (TA) and 23 peer support (PS) calls with financial navigators (FN). First, we deductively coded all implementation-relevant content into the five domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We then inductively generated themes and sub-themes within each of the CFIR domains. Coder reliability was assessed at multiple points during coding via coder consensus.ResultsThe qualitative analysis of nearly 78 h of TA and PS calls with FNs resulted in 18 themes and 91 sub-themes across the six CFIR domains. Outer setting themes (7 themes, 37 sub-themes) included institutional workforce problems, limited organizational resources for specific needs, and the unpredictability of external resource application success. Determinants in the inner setting (3 themes, 18 sub-themes) included existing clinical infrastructure and navigators' competing responsibilities in the clinic. Determinants in the individual domain (2 themes, 11 sub-themes) were the navigator workload and the patient motivation to engage in LIFT. Determinants in the innovation domain (2 themes, 5 sub-themes) were the intervention structure (ie, sequence and timing of LIFT activities). The most common implementation strategies (ie, process; 4 themes, 23 sub-themes) were pacing intervention content to meet patient needs, reframing the study to appeal to patients, and changing intervention delivery (eg, allowing phone visits).ConclusionsThis analysis highlights the challenges of implementing FN across multiple oncology sites, with workforce and administrative barriers being key challenges. Operational process data such as TA and PS calls can provide valuable information to guide implementation.