Critical Care Advanced Practice Providers: Practice and Workforce.
Kwame Asante Akuamoah-Boateng, Amita Avadhani, Danny Lizano, Amy Westwick Butcher, Chris Newman, Damayanti Samanta, Ana Lia Graciano, Peter Sandor
Abstract
Open AccessIMPORTANCE: This study provides nationally representative data on critical care advanced practice provider (APP) workforce structure and practice, addressing gaps in onboarding, productivity assessment, and administrative roles that influence workforce sustainability. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the composition of the clinical practice and workforce demographics of critical care medicine APPs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We utilized a cross-sectional survey, which was distributed via email through the Society of Critical Care Medicine email list, targeting critical care APPs. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A total of 518 critical care APPs participated in the survey, comprising 63.2% advanced practice registered nurses, 28.8% physician assistants, and 8% clinical nurse specialists. The majority of the sample APPs worked 12-hour shifts covering days, nights, and weekends, with over 50% managing 6-10 patients per day shift. Common billing practices included critical care time (60.6%) and bedside invasive procedures (64.3%). Formal onboarding was reported by 68.6% of respondents, with academic hospitals more likely to offer such programs than community hospitals (72.3% vs. 27.7%; p < 0.001). Administrative APP roles were more prevalent in academic centers (p < 0.001) and were associated with greater access to professional development opportunities (p < 0.001). A significant proportion of respondents (41.5%) reported that their productivity was not formally measured. Notably, 22% of respondents reported an intent to leave the profession, particularly those lacking leadership or professional growth opportunities (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study captures practice trends and demographics of the critical care APP workforce. Day-to-day tasks among all respondents were globally clinically focused, but there were disparities in workload distribution, onboarding, productivity measurement, and administrative roles across types of centers. Additionally, there was significant association between limited professional growth opportunities and intent to leave critical care. These findings underscore the need for healthcare systems to invest in structured support, leadership development, and professional growth to enhance APP retention, engagement, and productivity. Further research is needed to identify efficient workload and staffing models.