npj climate action
Could lessons from medical research ethics inform better conversations and governance for climate engineering research.
Shaun D Fitzgerald, Albert Van Wijngaarden, Ramit Debnath, Zoe Fritz
Published: 202610.1038/s44168-025-00333-3
Abstract
Open AccessConversations about climate engineering are difficult to have in many spaces. While public debate deserves exploration, we focus on the difficulties scientific discussions around climate engineering face. For inspiration on how to improve this contested space we turn specifically to the history of controversial medical research. Some ways to move forward might consist of establishing an oversight mechanism, defining boundaries and introducing a specialised review system.