The impact of confounders, spillovers and interactions on social distancing policy effects estimates.
José Ramón Enríquez, Horacio Larreguy, Alberto Simpser
Abstract
Open AccessSocial distancing policies have been widely used to curb the spread of infectious diseases such as COVID-19, but assessing their effectiveness is challenging. This study shows that widely-used methods to estimate the effects of such policies, like Two-way Fixed Effects and Difference-in-Differences, are highly sensitive to accounting, or failing to account, for the simultaneous adoption of policies and the presence of spillovers across geographies stemming from human movement. By estimating a series of nonparametric models on fine-grained mobility, epidemiological, and policy data from Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic, this research shows that failing to consider confounders, interactions, and spillovers can change the magnitude and the sign of estimated policy effects, hampering the design of optimal public policies.