Oral Melatonin in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Quasi-Experimental Pragmatic Trial.
Miguel Sánchez-García, Jesús A F Tresguerres, Manuel Álvarez-González, Belén de la Hera, Virginia Puebla, Lidia Ybañez, José-Manuel Martínez-Sesmero, Antonio Blesa, Juan-Carlos Martín-Benítez, Fernando Martínez-Sagasti, Paloma González-Arenas, Sara Domingo, Cándido Pardo, Silmary Maichle, Carolina Postigo
Abstract
Open AccessMelatonin has demonstrated antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and potential antiviral properties. Its therapeutic role in critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care was underexplored at the start of the pandemic. We conducted a quasi-experimental, pragmatic study over 4 consecutive uninterrupted time periods alternating control groups receiving standard of care (SoC) with treatment groups receiving SoC plus high-dose oral bedtime melatonin (50-200 mg) (OBM). The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality; secondary outcomes included sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores at 4, 7, 14, and 30 days and pre-defined severe adverse events (SAEs). A total of 335 of 339 consecutive patients with a predicted stay > 48 h were enrolled; 202 received OBM with SoC and 133 received SoC alone. OBM was dispensed during the second (n = 162) and fourth (n = 40) study periods after the first (n = 40) and third (n = 93) control group periods, respectively. Melatonin therapy was associated with significantly lower 90-day mortality (20.8% vs. 36.1%, OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28-0.76). Subjects receiving melatonin had lower SOFA scores on Day 4 and subsequent study visits. SAEs occurred in 84 (41.6%) subjects on OBM and in 80 (60.2%) receiving SoC (risk ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.87; p = 0.001). High-dose oral melatonin was safe and associated with improved clinical outcomes. Further evaluation of melatonin and its potential antiviral effects in future epidemics is warranted.