Eligibility for lecanemab and donanemab in Korea under Appropriate Use Recommendations.
So Yeon Jeon, Min Soo Byun, Hye Ji Choi, Yoon Hee Kim, Chung Hee Gwag, Yoonseok Oh, Jee Eun Park, Dahyun Yi, Gijung Jung, Hyejin Ahn, Bo Kyung Sohn, Joon Hyung Jung, Yoon Young Chang, Nayeong Kong, Hongyoon Choi
Abstract
Open AccessINTRODUCTION: Appropriate Use Recommendations (AURs) guide real-world use of lecanemab and donanemab in early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD), but their applicability to Asian populations with diverse education backgrounds remains unclear. METHODS: Among 2726 participants who visited a Korean memory clinic, 1005 amyloid-positive participants with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Clinical Dementia Rating data were included. Eligibility for lecanemab and donanemab was assessed using AUR criteria, including age, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), brain MRI, apolipoprotein E genotype (for donanemab), and anticoagulant use, applying both raw and z-score-based MMSE thresholds. RESULTS: Among 1005 amyloid-positive participants, 24.6% were eligible for lecanemab and 28.0% for donanemab (9.1% and 10.3% of the initial sample). Applying MMSE z-scores increased eligibility to 38.4% and 33.7%, respectively. Over a third of participants were excluded due to MRI findings, mainly vascular lesions associated with increased amyloid-related imaging-abnormality risks. DISCUSSION: Incorporating demographically adjusted MMSE z-score threshold improves real-world eligibility and promotes equitable access to anti-amyloid therapies. HIGHLIGHTS: About a fourth of A+ patients in Korea met AUR criteria for anti-amyloid therapy. Donanemab eligibility slightly exceeded lecanemab despite narrower age criteria. MMSE z-score adjustment increased eligibility in older, less-educated individuals. Over 30% of eligible patients were excluded due to ARIA-related MRI findings. Culturally adapted cognitive thresholds are essential for equitable treatment access.